Connect with us

Entertainment

Shahid Kapoor says he follows wife Mira Rajput’s script in their personal life: ‘Jo unka script sense hota hai…’

Published

on

Shahid-Kapoor-Mira-Rajput-ad-1200.jpg



Shahid Kapoor recently appeared on the finale of Amazon miniTV’s Case Toh Banta Hai, which is hosted by Ritesh Deshmukh, and made some hilarious revelations as to how he chooses his films.

Advertisement
While in conversation with the actor, who was in the witness stand, Riteish asked Shahid if he had ever liked a script and Shahid had a hilarious response to the question. Riteish asked, “Shahid, kabhi aisa hua hai ke aapko ek script acchi lagi ho (Shahid, has it ever happened that you liked a script)?” To this, Shahid laughed and responded, “Nahi, aisa kabhi nahi hua hai (laughs). Kaam karna padta hai sir, ghar chalana padta hai. (No, it has never happened (laughs) We have to work, run the household).”

Riteish then asked Shahid if his script sense ever saw any opposition from his wife Mira Kapoor. He asked, “Shahid, kabhi aisa hua hai ki aapke script sense aur Mira ji ke script sense mein kuch antar hua ho (Shahid, has it ever happened that you and Mira had a difference of opinion on any script)?” Shahid responded, “Ji personal life mein toh roz yahi hota hai, aur jo unka script sense hota hai ussi script par kaam kiya jata hai (This happens everyday in my personal life but whatever she says, goes).”

Advertisement

Case Toh Banta Hai saw guests like Varun Dhawan, Sanjay Dutt, Ananya Panday, Abhishek Bachchan, Pankaj Tripathi, Karan Johar among others in its first season. On a recent episode, Sanjay Dutt spoke about facing ‘unfunny allegations’ during his court cases. “Pehli baar aise hua hai ki court mein mere upar funny ilzaam lagega. Warna jitne bhi lage the na, unfunny lage the, watt lag gayi thi, watt (This has been the first time that in a court, I have been charged for being funny. Otherwise, whenever I have found myself in a court, the charges have always been of an extremely serious nature. I was at my wit’s end),” he said.



Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement

Entertainment

Gwyneth Paltrow not liable in Utah ski collision, jury says – National | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

By

2023032121034-641a54b6b853773905e70cadjpeg-11.jpg


Advertisement
Gwyneth Paltrow won her court battle over a 2016 ski collision at a posh Utah ski resort after a jury decided Thursday that the movie star wasn’t at fault for the crash.


A jury dismissed the complaint of a retired optometrist who sued Paltrow over injuries he sustained when the two crashed on a beginner run at Deer Valley ski resort, siding with Paltrow after eight days of live-streamed courtroom testimony that made the case a pop culture fixation.

Paltrow, an actor who in recent years has refashioned herself into a celebrity wellness entrepreneur, looked to her attorneys with a pursed lips smile when the judge read the eight-member jury’s verdict in the Park City courtroom. She sat intently through two weeks of testimony in what became the biggest celebrity court case since actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard faced off last year.

Advertisement

Read more:

Gwyneth Paltrow takes stand in ski crash trial, denies ‘risky behaviour’ that day

Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement

The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on reputation rather than the monetary damages at stake in the case. Paltrow’s attorneys described the complaint against her as “utter B.S.” and painted the Goop founder-CEO as uniquely vulnerable to unfair, frivolous lawsuits due to her celebrity.

Paltrow took the witness stand during the trial to insist the collision wasn’t her fault, and to describe how she was stunned when she felt “a body pressing against me and a very strange grunting noise.”

Advertisement

Click to play video: '‘I did not cause the accident’: Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in ski collision trial'


‘I did not cause the accident’: Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in ski collision trial


Advertisement

Throughout the trial, the word “uphill” became synonymous with “guilty, ” as attorneys focused on a largely unknown skiing code of conduct that stipulates that the skier who is downhill or ahead on the slope has the right of way.

Advertisement

Worldwide audiences followed the celebrity trial as if it were episodic television. Viewers scrutinized both Paltrow and Sanderson’s motives while attorneys directed questions to witnesses that often had less to do with the collision and more to do with their client’s reputations.

Story continues below advertisement

Advertisement

The trial took place in Park City, a resort town known for hosting the annual Sundance Film Festival, where early in her career Paltrow would appear for the premieres of her movies including 1998’s “Sliding Doors,” at a time when she was known primarily as an actor, not a lifestyle influencer. Paltrow is also known for her roles in “Shakespeare in Love,” which won her an Academy Award, and the “Iron Man” movies.


Click to play video: 'Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson testifies he was hit in the back by skier,  went ‘flying’'


Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson testifies he was hit in the back by skier, went ‘flying’


Advertisement

The jury’s decision marks a painful court defeat for Terry Sanderson, the man who sued Paltrow for more than $300,000 over injuries he sustained when they crashed on a beginner run. Both parties blamed the other for the collision. Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him.

Advertisement

Read more:

Man suing Gwyneth Paltrow takes stand at ski crash trial: ‘I’m living another life now’

Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement

He filed an amended complaint after an earlier $3.1 million lawsuit was dismissed. Paltrow in response countersued for $1 and attorney fees, a symbolic action that mirrors Taylor Swift’s response to a radio host’s defamation lawsuit. Swift was awarded $1 in 2017.

Paltrow’s defense team tried to paint Sanderson as an angry, aging and unsympathetic man who had over the years become “obsessed” with his lawsuit against Paltrow. They argued that Paltrow wasn’t at fault in the crash and also said, regardless of blame, that Sanderson was overstating the extent of his injuries.

Advertisement

AP writer Anna Furman contributed from Los Angeles.

&copy 2023 The Canadian Press

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Jennifer Aniston says ‘Friends’ offensive to ‘a whole generation of kids’ – National | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

By

GettyImages-1477726175.jpg


Advertisement
It’s The One With the Brutally Honest Actor: Friends star Jennifer Aniston is the latest celebrity to discuss the difficulties of working in comedy and making modern, apparently more sensitive audiences laugh.


Aniston, who has been working in film and comedy for nearly three decades, told the French news agency AFP that it’s become “a little tricky” to produce comedies because you have to be “very careful.” She said this is especially troubling because “the beauty of comedy is that we make fun of ourselves, make fun of life.”

Read more:

Gwyneth Paltrow ‘shaken up’ after ski crash, says daughter Apple Martin

Advertisement

Aniston, 54, lamented the past when she said: “You could joke about a bigot and have a laugh — that was hysterical. And it was about educating people on how ridiculous people were.”

Story continues below advertisement

Advertisement

She used her role as Rachel Green in the 1990s sitcom Friends as an example of how audiences have evolved over the years.

“There’s a whole generation of people, kids, who are now going back to episodes of Friends and find them offensive,” she said.

Advertisement

Aniston blamed the offensiveness on a combination of “things that were never intentional” and elements of the program that just lacked thought.

Friends, a comedy about six young people in New York, has long since been criticized for a lack of diversity. All of the show’s main characters are white. While actors of colour appeared sparsely in short cameo roles, the most prominent, non-white actor on the show, Aisha Tyler (who played Charlie Wheeler), appeared in only nine episodes.

Advertisement

Read more:

Lolita the orca to be freed to ‘home waters’ after 50+ years in captivity

Some of the jokes in friends have also been labelled transphobic or homophobic.

Advertisement

Co-creator of the sitcom, Marta Kauffman, said last year she was “embarrassed” and felt “guilt” over the lack of diversity in Friends.

“It’s painful looking at yourself in the mirror. I’m embarrassed that I didn’t know better 25 years ago,” Kauffman told the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement

Friends ran from 1994 to 2004. It is one of the most profitable sitcoms ever created, bringing in reportedly US$1.4 billion since its initial debut.

Advertisement

As a result of increased sensitivity, Aniston said less comedies are being made today than in decades prior. Not having comedies, she said, is a tragedy.

Advertisement

“Everybody needs funny! The world needs humour!” she said. “We can’t take ourselves too seriously. Especially in the United States. Everyone is far too divided.”

Read more:

Jeremy Renner shares haunting 911 call of snowplow accident in emotional 1st TV interview

Advertisement

Numerous popular comedians have already complained about producing comedy in the post-woke age. In particular, Dave Chappelle and Chris Rock have been especially outspoken about cancel culture and comedy.


Click to play video: 'Comedian Dave Chappelle tackled on stage during Los Angeles show'


Comedian Dave Chappelle tackled on stage during Los Angeles show

Advertisement


Advertisement

Still, Aniston charges on. In her latest comedy, Murder Mystery 2, Aniston plays Audrey Spitz, a detective solving the case of a kidnapped billionaire alongside her partner Nick (played by Adam Sandler). Murder Mystery 2 is available to stream on Netflix on Friday.

Advertisement

&copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Ducks,’ Kate Beaton’s graphic memoir about Alberta’s oilsands, wins Canada Reads | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

By

20230125100116-ddab043e8d7a88e15a28f9348fb60dc101cfdf3d345e9eb904cfcf9f616e13ea.jpg


Advertisement

Advertisement
Kate Beaton’s “Ducks” has won this year’s edition of Canada Reads.


The graphic memoir published last year by Drawn & Quarterly traces Beaton’s two years working in Alberta’s oilsands.

Read more:

Kate Beaton’s graphic memoir ‘Ducks’ gives insight into working at Alberta’s oilsands

Advertisement

Jeopardy! super-champion Mattea Roach defended the book during the four-day competition that aired live on CBC Radio.

“Ducks” won the competition Thursday, beating out Emily St. John Mandel’s novel “Station Eleven,” which was championed by actor-director Michael Greyeyes.

Advertisement

“Hotline” by Dimitri Nasrallah, championed by bhangra dancer Gurdeep Pandher, was voted off Wednesday; “Greenwood” by Michael Christie, championed by actress Keegan Connor Tracy, was eliminated Tuesday; and “Mexican Gothic” by Silvia Moreno-Garcia, championed by TikToker Tasnim Geedi, didn’t make it past the first day, Monday.

Story continues below advertisement

Advertisement

This year’s competition sought to find “one book to shift your perspective.”


Click to play video: 'Fear and frustration over Kearl oilsands tailings leaks'


Fear and frustration over Kearl oilsands tailings leaks

Advertisement


Advertisement

&copy 2023 The Canadian Press

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending