Connect with us

Entertainment

Jaya Bachchan feels physical compatibility is important for long-lasting relationships: ‘In our times, we could not experiment’

Published

on

jaya-bachchan-1200.jpg



Veteran actor Jaya Bachchan does not mince words when it comes to expressing her opinions. In the latest episode of her granddaughter Navya Naveli Nanda’s podcast, whose subject was ‘Modern Love: Romance & Regrets’, Jaya emphasised the importance of physical intimacy in a relationship. According to her, people should stop attaching taboos to physical intimacy, as it’s the key to long-lasting relationships.

Advertisement
Giving some relationship advice, the Abhimaan actor said, “People might find it objectionable coming from me, but physical attraction and compatibility are very important. In our times, we could not experiment. But today’s generation, they do, and why shouldn’t they, because that is also responsible for a long-lasting relationship. If there is no physical relationship, it’s not going to last very long. You just can’t be lasting on love, fresh air and adjustments.”

The 74-year-old actor opined that the younger generation should not feel guilty about physical relationships. She added, “A lot of the younger generation would feel guilty going through that experience. It’s very wrong. It’s okay if you had a physical relationship and still you feel your relationship has otherwise not worked out, you can be nice about it. But why are we being hypocrites? Every young girl goes through it. They hide it from their family, which is okay, maybe you do not talk about your physical relationships. But why are we putting taboos on people?”

Advertisement

Jaya’s daughter, Shweta Bachchan, felt all these taboos are put around physical relationships to “control women”. She said on the podcast, “It’s to control women. Women do not have a say about their bodies. All their decisions are made by men.” Listening to the argument put across by Shweta, Jaya Bachchan felt “terrible”.

The veteran star also told her granddaughter Navya that though societal standards dictate that women should be married before having kids, she does not agree.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement

Entertainment

‘The Last of Us’ season 2 will be shot in Vancouver | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

By

CP166122901.jpg


Advertisement

Advertisement
It appears that one of the biggest shows on TV is moving production to Vancouver.


As first reported by Deadline, The Last of Us will be filming season 2 in the west coast province.

“We’re incredibly excited to have one of the largest shows on television choose to film in Vancouver,” Mayor Ken Sim told Vancouver’s Economic Commission Friday.

Advertisement

“Vancouver is Hollywood North – this announcement is a demonstration of our city’s continued strength in the film and television sector. As we look to the future, I’m confident that we will see even more productions decide to make their home here.”

Global News has reached out to HBO and Creative BC for comment.

Advertisement

Click to play video: 'Travel Alberta hopes ‘The Last of Us’ success leads to boom in tourism'


Travel Alberta hopes ‘The Last of Us’ success leads to boom in tourism


Advertisement

Read more:

‘The Last of Us’: All the Alberta locations that got a dramatic makeover

Advertisement
Story continues below advertisement

The blockbuster hit’s first season was shot exclusively in Alberta starting in 2021 and used an astonishing 180 locations around the province, from Grande Prairie all the way down to Waterton Lakes National Park.

Advertisement

The City of Calgary said in a statement that it was notified Friday morning of the decision to move production to Vancouver.

Advertisement

Global News reached out to one of the unions whose members worked on the show in Alberta and a spokesperson said a producer confirmed the news to them.

They were not surprised, however, as the season two storyline is dependant on marine-based locals, which Alberta does not have.

Advertisement

&copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

3 people arrested in alleged Tekashi 6ix9ine gym attack, robbery – National | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

By

GettyImages-1026349632.jpg


Advertisement
Three people have been arrested in connection with the alleged assault and robbery of rapper Tekashi 6ix9ine at a South Florida gym last week, the local sheriff’s office said Thursday.


Rafael Medina Jr., 43, Octavious Medina, 23, and Anthony Maldonado, 25, were taken into police custody on Thursday. The Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement the three suspects “have been located, arrested and are currently being booked/processed into the Palm Beach County Jail.”

Read more:

Jennifer Aniston says ‘Friends’ offensive to ‘a whole generation of kids’

Advertisement
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement

Jail records show the suspects are all being held on preliminary charges of felony battery and robbery.

Tekashi 6ix9ine, whose real name is Daniel Hernandez, was allegedly attacked without warning inside a sauna at an LA Fitness on March 21. (Ed. Note: The preceding link contains violent footage.)

Advertisement

One person filmed the attack on Hernandez, 26, who can be seen lying on the ground shielding his face as two men kick him. In the video, one attacker pulled Hernandez’s hair and taunted, “Take a picture. I want to be famous now.”

Read more:

Gwyneth Paltrow not liable in Utah ski collision, jury says

Advertisement

Hernandez was taken to hospital. His lawyer said he obtained “cuts to his face and bruises.” TMZ reported the rapper also suffered injuries to his jaw, ribs and back.

The Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office said all three attackers would make their first court appearance on Friday morning.

Advertisement

Suspects Rafael Medina, Jr., Octavious Medina, and Anthony Maldonado were arrested on March 30, 2023, in connection to an alleged assault and robbery of rapper Tekashi 6ix9ine.


Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office

In April 2020, Hernandez was released from federal prison, where he served a two-year sentence for charges including racketeering, drug trafficking and firearm offences, all in connection with the Nine Trey Bloods gang.

Story continues below advertisement

Read more:

Jeremy Renner shares haunting 911 call of snowplow accident in emotional 1st TV interview

Advertisement

He was given a shorter prison sentence after he co-operated with federal officials and provided names of his associates. The deal earned him leniency from charges that could have subjected him to a mandatory minimum of 37 years in prison for crimes that included orchestrating a shooting in which an innocent bystander was wounded.


Click to play video: 'What is racketeering? Rapper 6ix9ine pleads not guilty to RICO charges'


What is racketeering? Rapper 6ix9ine pleads not guilty to RICO charges

Advertisement


Advertisement

The deal saw Hernandez labelled a “rat” by the likes of rappers Meek Mill and Snoop Dogg, among others.

It is not known whether the plea deal served as motivation for last week’s attack against Hernandez.

Advertisement

&copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Gwyneth Paltrow not liable in Utah ski collision, jury says – National | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

By

2023032121034-641a54b6b853773905e70cadjpeg-11.jpg


Advertisement
Gwyneth Paltrow won her court battle over a 2016 ski collision at a posh Utah ski resort after a jury decided Thursday that the movie star wasn’t at fault for the crash.


A jury dismissed the complaint of a retired optometrist who sued Paltrow over injuries he sustained when the two crashed on a beginner run at Deer Valley ski resort, siding with Paltrow after eight days of live-streamed courtroom testimony that made the case a pop culture fixation.

Paltrow, an actor who in recent years has refashioned herself into a celebrity wellness entrepreneur, looked to her attorneys with a pursed lips smile when the judge read the eight-member jury’s verdict in the Park City courtroom. She sat intently through two weeks of testimony in what became the biggest celebrity court case since actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard faced off last year.

Advertisement

Read more:

Gwyneth Paltrow takes stand in ski crash trial, denies ‘risky behaviour’ that day

Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement

The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on reputation rather than the monetary damages at stake in the case. Paltrow’s attorneys described the complaint against her as “utter B.S.” and painted the Goop founder-CEO as uniquely vulnerable to unfair, frivolous lawsuits due to her celebrity.

Paltrow took the witness stand during the trial to insist the collision wasn’t her fault, and to describe how she was stunned when she felt “a body pressing against me and a very strange grunting noise.”

Advertisement

Click to play video: '‘I did not cause the accident’: Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in ski collision trial'


‘I did not cause the accident’: Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in ski collision trial


Advertisement

Throughout the trial, the word “uphill” became synonymous with “guilty, ” as attorneys focused on a largely unknown skiing code of conduct that stipulates that the skier who is downhill or ahead on the slope has the right of way.

Advertisement

Worldwide audiences followed the celebrity trial as if it were episodic television. Viewers scrutinized both Paltrow and Sanderson’s motives while attorneys directed questions to witnesses that often had less to do with the collision and more to do with their client’s reputations.

Story continues below advertisement

Advertisement

The trial took place in Park City, a resort town known for hosting the annual Sundance Film Festival, where early in her career Paltrow would appear for the premieres of her movies including 1998’s “Sliding Doors,” at a time when she was known primarily as an actor, not a lifestyle influencer. Paltrow is also known for her roles in “Shakespeare in Love,” which won her an Academy Award, and the “Iron Man” movies.


Click to play video: 'Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson testifies he was hit in the back by skier,  went ‘flying’'


Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson testifies he was hit in the back by skier, went ‘flying’


Advertisement

The jury’s decision marks a painful court defeat for Terry Sanderson, the man who sued Paltrow for more than $300,000 over injuries he sustained when they crashed on a beginner run. Both parties blamed the other for the collision. Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him.

Advertisement

Read more:

Man suing Gwyneth Paltrow takes stand at ski crash trial: ‘I’m living another life now’

Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement

He filed an amended complaint after an earlier $3.1 million lawsuit was dismissed. Paltrow in response countersued for $1 and attorney fees, a symbolic action that mirrors Taylor Swift’s response to a radio host’s defamation lawsuit. Swift was awarded $1 in 2017.

Paltrow’s defense team tried to paint Sanderson as an angry, aging and unsympathetic man who had over the years become “obsessed” with his lawsuit against Paltrow. They argued that Paltrow wasn’t at fault in the crash and also said, regardless of blame, that Sanderson was overstating the extent of his injuries.

Advertisement

AP writer Anna Furman contributed from Los Angeles.

&copy 2023 The Canadian Press

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending