Connect with us

Entertainment

Alan Cross: How much longer will we be able to buy digital downloads of songs? – National | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

gettyimages-1066269076.jpg


Advertisement
When Steve Jobs made the rounds of major record labels in 2000, he knew he had them over a barrel.


Music piracy, kicked into high gear by the original Napster the previous June, was a threat to the recorded music industry. The new frontier for music was online and the labels were completely ill-equipped to deal with the greatest shift in music distribution in a century. They had to get in on the business of selling music digitally, but how?

Oh, the labels tried to build their own download stores, but Pressplay (originally called Duet and owned by Universal and Sony) and Musicnet (all the other majors) were miserable failures. First, they were expensive. For $15 a month, fans could stream 500 songs each month, get 50 song downloads and the ability to burn each of those songs to CD 10 times.

Advertisement

Second, it was chaotic for the consumer. You needed to know what label a song or artist was on before. The terms of use were confusing and digital rights management (DRM) locks on the files made moving them around difficult and frustrating. It was much, much easier to just steal music.

Story continues below advertisement

Advertisement

Third, the labels couldn’t work together on a unified platform because that would have violated all kinds of anti-trust rules, a legal situation that also help scupper the labels’ proposed purchase of Napster.

Read more:

Tables have turned — Vinyl records outsell CDs for 1st time since 1987

Advertisement

The labels had all the digital products but no way to distribute and sell them. Apple’s iTunes offered a way out of this bind.

Jobs convinced the labels that allowing him to sell individual songs for 99 cents each was the way to go. And because the labels had no idea what they were doing — and because Apple was committed to spending millions on marketing (not to mention they had this new gadget called an iPod) — the labels all signed on with the iTunes Music Store.

Advertisement

His pitch worked, and boom — the music industry changed forever.

There had been other attempts at creating digital music stores. Cductive was founded in 1996 and sold MP3 downloads for 99 cents (it was acquired by eMusic in 1999). Sony debuted Bitmusic in Japan in 1999, offering mostly singles from Japanese artists (it failed). Factory Records launched Music33, which offered downloads for 33 pence each (ditto). There was even a Canadian digital music store called Puretracks that lasted for about a nanosecond.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement

Nothing beat iTunes, especially when the labels agreed to remove all DRM locks in 2007. (I still have songs on my computer in the old .mp4a format that are locked up and can’t be freely transferred from one place to another.) It soon became de rigueur for all releases to be available through iTunes.

Advertisement

And because the iTunes Music Store was so easy to use on all computers (offering a Windows version was a huge deal), it became the favourite destination for buying digital albums and tracks. At one point, iTunes was responsible for 70 per cent of all digital music sales. Almost every would-be challenger was crushed. Hey, anyone remember hmvdigital.com?

But the whole shift from selling pieces of plastic to digital tracks left a bad taste in the mouths of the labels. They’d completely ceded distribution of their product to an outsider who charged a 30 per cent commission on each file sold. They vowed never to let that happen again.

Advertisement

Read more:

Alan Cross remembers when instrumentals still ruled the charts

Fast forward to today. Streaming, not downloads, is king and the labels have firm control over how streamers may do business. They made more than US$10 billion from streaming in 2022. They also continuously receive petabytes and petabytes of data on how music fans consume music.

Advertisement

And because streaming is so cheap — or even free — music piracy is a fraction of what it used to be.

Story continues below advertisement

Advertisement

As a result, sales of digital tracks and albums continue to plummet. In Canada, the sales of digital albums are down 15.9 per cent from this time last year and digital track sales have fallen by 7.5 per cent. Meanwhile, streaming is up 13.9 per cent from a year ago as Canadians reliably stream somewhere around 2.3 billion songs a week.

Advertisement

I can make the situation sound even more dire. In 2012, we bought 1.3 billion digital tracks. Last year, we bought 152 million. That’s a crash of 88.6 per cent in a decade. These numbers obviously aren’t good. Paid downloads are quickly becoming the next cassette.

Sales were once front-and-centre on the iTunes home page. Now you have to hunt a bit for the iTunes Music Store when you open the app. If you go to Amazon, a search for MP3s takes you to a page that pushes streaming and physical product. Neither company breaks out how much digital music they sell in their financial reports.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement

So here’s the question: How long will Apple support iTunes? Heck, how much longer do all digital tracks/albums sales have? Let me issue a plea that this never happens.

Advertisement

Click to play video: 'Tech Talk: Twitter may have a rival & vinyl record sales take-off'


Tech Talk: Twitter may have a rival & vinyl record sales take-off

Advertisement


Advertisement

I desperately need iTunes to continue because of my work. I need to gain full and legal access to songs to produce my radio show, The Ongoing History of New Music, so I buy up to a dozen songs a week. My Mac tells me I have 79,655 items taking up 564.65 gigabytes in my library. A non-insignificant number of those songs are iTunes downloads.

There are many uses for downloads. DJs need files they can mix as part of their sets. Older music fans brought up on a diet of purchasing CDs and vinyl also like iTunes because it offers permanent ownership instead of renting music from streamers. Insiders know that if downloads for an artist increase, it may show that the artist has crossed over to an older demo.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement

Artists can also see decent revenue from iTunes, especially after they’re in the news for something. Paid downloads spike up and they pay out far, far more than streams. Artists, labels and managers also monitor iTunes for songs that may pop on iTunes’ charts, a possible indication that something interesting is happening.

Advertisement

Read more:

How did the Canadian music industry do in 2022? The year-end stats are out

What are the options if iTunes goes away as Google Play Music did? Well, there are other digital music storefronts. There’s the aforementioned eMusic, which came online selling DRM-free MP3s in January 1998, three years before iTunes debuted. It has contracts with the major labels and dozens of indies. Unlike iTunes and Amazon Music, it’s a download-to-own site that requires the purchase of a monthly membership. Its library isn’t as deep as iTunes (15 million songs vs at least 60 million) but it can do the job for some people.

Advertisement

The most interesting digital music storefronts are those selling hi-res lossless files for people who demand the highest in audio quality. For example, 7 Digital will sell you all kinds of digital music, including plenty of 24-bit FLAC files. That’s fantastic — if you have the necessary hardware.

The same goes for Pro Studio Masters (I used it quite a bit for buying FLAC files). If that’s your jam, be sure to check out HDTracks and France’s Qobuz. which will debut in Canada later this year.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement

DJs and dance music fans have long known about Beatport. If you’re into the indie side of things, you’ve probably purchased a download or two from Bandcamp. And then there’s Bleep, which focuses on independent artists and labels.

Advertisement

Still, though, it’s hard to beat iTunes for selection and functionality. I really, really hope Apple doesn’t do something stupid like kill it. But with each week’s music industry sales numbers, you have to wonder how far things can drop before it’s time to move on.

If that day comes, it will be very, very sad.

Advertisement

Alan Cross is a broadcaster with Q107 and 102.1 the Edge and a commentator for Global News.

Advertisement

Subscribe to Alan’s Ongoing History of New Music Podcast now on Apple Podcast or Google Play

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement

Entertainment

Bad Bunny sued for $40M by ex-girlfriend over song sample – National | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

By

GettyImages-1412405003.jpg


Advertisement
Fans are already familiar with the artist’s breathy tagline, “Bad Bunny, baby” — but the Puerto Rican rapper is now being sued for at least US$40 million by his ex-girlfriend, who claims he used the recording of her voice without permission.


Carliz De La Cruz Hernández said she recorded the audio for Bad Bunny, whose real name is Benito Martínez Ocasio, before he skyrocketed to international fame, as per a new lawsuit filed in a Puerto Rico court. She alleged she invented the phrase.

Read more:

Bruce Willis’ wife shares tearful message about grief on actor’s 68th birthday

Advertisement

The lawsuit, which was first reported by the Puerto Rico news website NotiCel, claimed the unauthorized recording is used in the 29-year-old singer’s songs, Pa Ti from 2017 and Dos Mil 16, which is featured on the Grammy-winning album Un Verano Sin Ti. The tracks have been streamed on Spotify at least 235 million times each.

Story continues below advertisement

Advertisement

As per the lawsuit, De La Cruz claimed her “Bad Bunny, baby” audio has been used for numerous promotions, worldwide concerts, television, radio and social appearances.

Advertisement

Due to her “distinguishable voice,” De La Cruz said she’s been barraged with messages and comments about the unauthorized recording.

“Since then, thousands of people have commented directly on Carliz’s social media networks, as well as every time she goes to a public place, about the ‘Bad Bunny, baby.’ This has caused, and currently causes, that De La Cruz feels worried, anguished, intimidated, overwhelmed and anxious,” reads the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Read more:

Rupert Murdoch, 92, to marry for the 5th time: ‘I knew this would be my last’

Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement

De La Cruz is also suing Martínez’s manager, Noah Kamil Assad Byrne.

Neither Martínez nor Assad has commented publicly on the lawsuit.

Advertisement

In the legal filing, De La Cruz claimed a representative for the reggaetón singer contacted her in May 2022, shortly before Un Verano Sin Ti was released. She said the representative offered her $2,000 for the voice recording. At this point, the “Bad Bunny, baby,” audio had already been used in 2017’s Pa Ti. 

Advertisement

De La Cruz allegedly declined the payment on the grounds that she was apparently not comfortable with her voice being featured. She said the song was published anyway without her consent.

“Since de la Cruz made it clear that she did not consent to its use, its publication constituted an act of gross negligence, bad faith, and, worse still, an attack on their privacy, morals, and dignity since all parties had and still have knowledge of these facts and even so decided to be reckless and break the law,” the filing reads.

Story continues below advertisement

Advertisement

Read more:

Gwyneth Paltrow to take the stand in $300K ski crash lawsuit 

The lawsuit outlines the relationship between De La Cruz and Martínez, who apparently started dating in 2011, before he was signed to the label Rimas Entertainment. At the time, De La Cruz claimed she was responsible for managing her artist boyfriend’s invoices, contracts and scheduling.

Advertisement

She said she recorded the “Bad Bunny, baby” audio in the bathroom of a party in 2015, as it was the quietest room available at the time.

The pair ended their relationship in 2017, a year after Martínez asked to marry De La Cruz.

Advertisement

In February, Martínez won a Grammy for Best Música Urbana Album for Un Verano Sin Ti. The album was also nominated for the coveted Album of the Year award but lost out to Harry’s House by Harry Styles.


Click to play video: 'Grammys 2023: Ontario grandma and Harry Styles superfan steals the show'


Grammys 2023: Ontario grandma and Harry Styles superfan steals the show

Advertisement


Advertisement

With files from The Associated Press 

&copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Gwyneth Paltrow to take the stand in $300K ski crash lawsuit  – National | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

By

GettyImages-1197778966.jpg


Advertisement

Advertisement
Actor and entrepreneur Gwyneth Paltrow will appear in court next week to testify in a civil case filed by a retired optometrist claiming she caused him serious injury in a 2016 ski accident, as per numerous reports.


Terry Sanderson has accused Paltrow, 50, of negligence and is suing for US$300,000 (about $410,000). He alleged the Goop founder collided with him while skiing at Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah, “knocking him down hard, knocking him out.”

Read more:

Gwyneth Paltrow faces backlash over her restrictive food habits: ‘It’s not wellness’

Advertisement

In the complaint filed in 2019, Sanderson, 76, said the accident left him with “permanent traumatic brain injury, 4 broken ribs, pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life.” He maintains that Paltrow left him collapsed on the slope and skied away.

Story continues below advertisement

Advertisement

In a counterclaim, Paltrow said Sanderson skied into her in a “full body hit,” giving her minor injuries that prevented her from skiing the next day. She claims he apologized to her after the accident.

Advertisement

Paltrow said she only left the scene of the accident after a Deer Valley Resort employee gave confirmation she could depart.

She also alleged Sanderson has said before that he does not have a clear memory of the accident.

Advertisement

In 2019, Sanderson classified the accident as a hit-and-run but that was later struck down by a judge. Any mention of incidences after the collision — including an allegation from Sanderson that a resort employee who did not witness the crash skied off and accused Sanderson of being responsible for the accident — were also disallowed.


Click to play video: 'Gwyneth Paltrow’s ‘The Goop Lab’: Fact-checking the health claims'


Gwyneth Paltrow’s ‘The Goop Lab’: Fact-checking the health claims


Advertisement

Read more:

Bruce Willis’ wife shares tearful message about grief on actor’s 68th birthday

Advertisement
Story continues below advertisement

Sanderson’s original lawsuit sought $3.1 million in damages.

Advertisement

In her counterclaim, Paltrow is seeking only $1 in damages (a symbolic gesture), and capital for her lawyer’s fees.

The trial is set to begin on March 21 in Utah. To win the civil suit, Sanderson must demonstrate the burden of proof and prove his injuries were directly caused by the ski collision.

Advertisement

&copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Fans petition for Pedro Pascal to be 2023 Calgary Stampede parade marshal | Globalnews.ca

Published

on

By

20230314090312-641072acb853773905e4a486jpeg.jpg


Advertisement

Advertisement
An online petition is hoping to see one of the stars of The Last of Us named the 2023 Calgary Stampede parade marshal.


A Change.org petition wants Pedro Pascal, who plays Joel in the TV show, to lead the charge.

The parade marshal is usually announced at the end of May or early June.

Advertisement

Read more:

‘The Last of Us’: All the Alberta locations that got a dramatic makeover

Pascal spent time in Calgary and across the province filming the hit Crave series, including the Alberta legislature, the Bow River, the Ranchland Inn in Nanton, the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology (SAIT), Canmore Engine Bridge and Waterton Lakes National Park.

Advertisement

Click to play video: 'Travel Alberta sharing The Last of Us locations online'


Travel Alberta sharing The Last of Us locations online


Advertisement

In fact, in episode 1, When You’re Lost in the Darkness, Calgary’s downtown is used as a stand-in for Boston, and a specially designed set situated in the industrial area behind the Calgary Stampede grounds serves at the show’s Boston Quarantine Zone (QZ.)

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement

Pascal has also spoken about his love for Alberta, like exploring the mountains and seeing the northern lights.

Advertisement

Click to play video: '‘The Last of Us’ premiere draws excitement, momentum for Alberta film industry'


‘The Last of Us’ premiere draws excitement, momentum for Alberta film industry


Advertisement

As of 8 a.m. Monday, March 20, the petition had about 4,700 names.

Advertisement

Read more:

Academy Award winning actor Kevin Costner named 2022 Calgary Stampede parade marshal

Advertisement

Actor Kevin Costner was parade marshal in 2022.


Click to play video: 'Calgary Heritage Buildings featured in HBO’s The Last of Us'


Calgary Heritage Buildings featured in HBO’s The Last of Us

Advertisement


Advertisement

 

&copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending