Connect with us

Crypto

The Most Unworkable State Law

Published

on

5900CDA1F05D8BED42CB72364B0FCD7D4888241600089C78B2C82F447BCEB311.jpg


Advertisement
The cryptocurrency industry has recently criticised a bill that was recently proposed in the Illinois Senate due to its “unworkable” intentions to compel blockchain miners and validators to perform “impossible things.” One example of this would be undoing transactions if a state court ordered them to do so.

The Senate Bill was surreptitiously submitted into the Illinois senate on February 9 by Illinois Senator Robert Peters. However, it does not seem that the community was aware of it until February 19, when Florida-based attorney Drew Hinkes mentioned it in a tweet.

Advertisement

The bill, which would give the courts the authority to alter or rescind a blockchain transaction that was carried out through the use of a smart contract, would be given the title “Digital Property Protection and Law Enforcement Act,” and it would give the courts this authority in response to a valid request from the attorney general or a state’s attorney that is made in accordance with the laws of Illinois.

Any “blockchain network that executes a blockchain transaction originating in the State” would be subject to the act if it were to become law.

Advertisement

When it comes to blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies, Hinkes referred to the proposed legislation as “the most impractical state law” he has ever seen.

“This is a shocking about-face for a state that was previously supportive of innovation. Instead, he tweeted that the state had enacted “probably the most impractical state legislation relating to cryptocurrency and blockchain I have ever seen.”

Advertisement

According to the provisions of the law, miners and validators on the blockchain might be subject to fines ranging from $5,000 to $10,000 for each day that they disobey the instructions of the court.

Hinkes said that it would be “difficult” for miners and validators to comply with the measure suggested by Senator Peters, despite the fact that he acknowledged the need of passing legislation that would increase consumer protection.

Advertisement

Hinkes was also surprised to learn that miners and validators who worked on a blockchain network that “has not adopted reasonably available processes” to comply with the court orders would have “no defense” open to them.

The law also seems to dictate that “any person utilizing a smart contract to supply goods and services” must include code in the smart contract that may be used to comply with court orders. This code can be used to ensure that the terms of the smart contract are followed.

Advertisement

“Any person utilizing a smart contract to supply goods or services in this State should incorporate smart contract code capable of implementing court orders respecting the smart contract,” is the full text of the law.

Other members of the bitcoin community have replied with derision of the measure in a manner similar to what was previously said.

Advertisement

On February 19, the crypto analyst “foobar” remarked to the 120,800 people who follow him on Twitter that court-ordered transactions would need to be changed “without having the private key” of the participants, which he found to be “hilarious.”



Source link

Advertisement

Crypto

AI-powered project steals $1M from consumers.

Published

on

By

F5915E37D7FA191B7FC81B3E44BEB43458D4C5292BA069DEC85B68083C660C2C.jpg


Advertisement
A project that is claiming to be a “AI-based” decentralized application has taken almost one million dollars from its users in what is suspected to be a scam. This comes at the same time that artificial intelligence (AI) has recently become a topic of interest due to the capabilities displayed by ChatGPT v4.

At the time of this writing, the blockchain security platform CertiK has just revealed that Harvest Keeper has been responsible for the theft of about $933,000 worth of customers’ money. According to CertiK’s findings, users on the Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Polygon networks have together suffered losses of around 219 thousand dollars as a result of ice phishing transactions. The cybersecurity company pleaded with customers to take back whatever rights they had granted to the initiative and cautioned users to avoid engaging with the organization’s website.

Advertisement

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) initiative known as Harvest Keeper claims that it “optimizes the trading process for maximum payout” and guarantees a return of 4.81% on customer deposits. The platform advertises on its website that it would provide a return on investment of 101% within 21 days and an 8% incentive for referrals. The initiative has more than 32,000 people following it on its Telegram channel and approximately 30,000 people following it on Twitter.

On the other hand, in the midst of the renewed interest in ChatGPT on Twitter, hundreds of profiles on the social platform have arisen with the claim that they are associated with “CryptoGPT.” On March 10, a hashtag dubbed “CryptoGPT” that was related with an ongoing token project was trending on Twitter. As a result of it, a number of accounts that are quite similar to it have appeared, some of which advertise phony freebies. On top of that, dozens of Twitter accounts with the same name have been plaguing the social platform, and some of these accounts have been advertising freebies and airdrops that may or may not be real.

Advertisement

Once the most recent version of ChatGPT shown that it was capable of auditing smart contracts on Ethereum, many people began to wonder whether or not it would one day replace coders. Yet, when asked about this topic at the most recent ETHDubai event, blockchain engineers voiced their confidence that the newest version of the widely used AI tool would not replace developers but rather assist them.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Taiwan FSC to regulate crypto

Published

on

By

358F4F15DF412D582841BCAA1FEF15378D105EAA9818C1C9AF08D190E7824F96.jpg


Advertisement
According to the president of the authority, the Financial Supervisory Commission of Taiwan (FSC) will take over as the principal regulator of cryptocurrencies throughout the island nation.

According to the local United Daily News, the head of the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), Huang Tien-mu, made the announcement that the regulator would acquire supervisory responsibility over the cryptocurrency market in Taiwan.

Advertisement

On March 20, Huang gave a speech about the regulation of cryptocurrencies in the Republic of China before the Legislative Yuan in Taiwan (ROC). He said that the new crypto regulatory framework that will be implemented by the FSC would contain key laws and policies, such as the partitioning of consumer assets from corporate money and the implementation of investor protection procedures.

According to the source, the nation’s top administrative authority, known as the Executive Yuan, has given the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) the mandate to monitor payments and transactions in the cryptocurrency market at this time. Huang emphasized that other industry-related assets, such as nonfungible tokens (NFTs), may not come under the regulation of the Financial Stability Commission.

Advertisement

Huang also said that the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) will first focus a lot of emphasis on the concepts of self-regulation in the cryptocurrency market in Taiwan. The official continued by saying that the authority will act in accordance with the directives provided by the Executive Yuan.

According to a report that was published by Taiwan’s Central News Agency, Taiwanese legislators anticipate developing and approving an appropriate crypto legal framework by the end of March or at the earliest by the month of April. According to reports, the goal of the present preliminary plan is to place the oversight of the regulation of NFTs within the authority of the Ministry of Digital Affairs.

Advertisement

The announcement comes at a time when Taiwan is experiencing persistent tensions with China. The Chinese government views Taiwan as a renegade province, and it has pledged to bring Taiwan under its rule. China, which has emerged as a significant anti-crypto nation, will implement a total ban on crypto in 2021, in contrast to other jurisdictions in the Asia-Pacific area, such as Hong Kong or Singapore, which are crypto-friendly.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Australian Bankers Association cost of living probe shows bank pressure

Published

on

By

E32267327CCEB5C9F49BDA2D94642D793930647D6346D7B0BF5E8E67A69423AD.jpg


Advertisement
The Australian Banking Association (ABA), which is the trade association for the Australian banking industry, has initiated a cost of living inquiry in order to investigate the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic, global supply chain constraints, geopolitical tensions, and other factors have had on the people of Australia. The purpose of this investigation is to determine how these and other factors have affected the cost of living in Australia. The primary purpose of this inquiry is to determine the degree to which these and other factors, in addition to Australia’s already high cost of living, have contributed to that level of expense.

The recent analysis of the rising inflation and concurrent collapse of three major traditional banks — Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank — proved that more than 186 banks in the United States are at risk of a similar shutdown if depositors decide to withdraw all of their funds. These banks were Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank. Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank, and Signature Bank were the names of these financial institutions. These particular banking establishments went under the names Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank, and Signature Bank respectively. These specific financial institutions were known by the names Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank, and Signature Bank, respectively, at one point in time. At one point in time, these particular financial institutions were known by the names Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank, and Signature Bank, respectively. The Australian Bar Association (ABA) is currently in the process of conducting an investigation with the intention of determining both the response of the fiscal policies of the Australian government as well as the means by which the cost of living in Australia may be lowered. The goal of the investigation is to determine both the response of the fiscal policies of the Australian government as well as the means by which the cost of living in Australia may be lowered. Both the reaction of the Australian government’s fiscal policies and the ways by which the cost of living in Australia may be lowered are the foci of the inquiry, the objective of which is to discover which of these may be determined. The aim of the study is to determine both of these things at the same time as part of its objective.



Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending