Connect with us

Crypto

Cryptocurrency Community Debates Fallout from Closure of Major American Banks

Published

on

0F31733A90AA46FE464F3FB84B2025EB71B7461AC04C886B34A9E6D956F80B31.jpg


Advertisement
The closure of three major American banks that serve cryptocurrency firms has sent shockwaves through the broader cryptocurrency community. Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), which has traditionally served startups across several innovation sector industries, was shuttered by California’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation on March 10, while Signature Bank met a similar fate on March 12. The closures have sparked a debate within the cryptocurrency community about the risks of traditional finance institutions that serve fiat currency deposits, withdrawals, and monetary flows.

The reasons surrounding the closures are still coming to light, but they have caused particular concern within the cryptocurrency community due to their exposure to stablecoins. USD Coin (USDC) issuer Circle, for instance, had over $3.3 billion of its $40 billion reserves locked up in SVB, which caused major uncertainty around the effect Circle’s exposure would have on its ability to manage redemptions. As a result, the USDC stablecoin briefly lost its $1 peg. However, USDC has seen its peg creep back up to the $1 mark after Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire announced that the stablecoin issuer has lined up new banking partners in the United States.

Advertisement

The closure of the banks has also led the cryptocurrency ecosystem to take a closer look at neobank services that could potentially bypass or serve to bridge gaps exposed in the latest mainstream banking failure. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong took to Twitter on March 13 to discuss the need for more innovative solutions in the cryptocurrency industry. According to Armstrong, Coinbase has previously considered features that could potentially address the risks associated with traditional finance institutions.

One of the biggest risks associated with traditional finance institutions for cryptocurrency firms is the risk of bank runs. This was a major concern for Signature Bank, which was taken over by the New York Department of Financial Services to prevent further bank runs as customers scrambled to pull funds from SVB and Signature. As a result, there is a growing demand within the cryptocurrency community for neobank services that can offer stability and security.

Advertisement

One potential solution that has been proposed is for cryptocurrency firms to create their own neobank services. This would allow them to bypass the risks associated with traditional finance institutions altogether and create a more secure and stable financial ecosystem for the cryptocurrency industry. However, creating a neobank from scratch is not without its challenges, particularly in terms of regulatory compliance and capital requirements.

Another potential solution is to partner with existing neobank services that have already established themselves as trustworthy and reliable institutions. This would allow cryptocurrency firms to benefit from the stability and security offered by neobank services without having to build their own from scratch. However, this approach would still require regulatory compliance and would require cryptocurrency firms to give up some control over their financial ecosystem.

Advertisement

Regardless of the approach taken, it is clear that the closure of major American banks that serve cryptocurrency firms has exposed significant risks associated with traditional finance institutions. As a result, the cryptocurrency ecosystem is now exploring new ways to create a more stable and secure financial ecosystem that can support the growing demand for cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. Whether through the creation of new neobank services or through partnerships with existing institutions, the cryptocurrency industry is working to build a financial ecosystem that can weather the challenges of the traditional financial sector.

In addition to neobank services, the cryptocurrency industry is also exploring other innovative solutions to address the risks associated with traditional finance institutions. For example, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms have emerged as a potential alternative to traditional banking services. DeFi platforms operate on blockchain technology and allow users to access financial services without relying on intermediaries like banks. By eliminating intermediaries, DeFi platforms can reduce the risks associated with traditional banking and offer greater transparency and security to users.

Advertisement

However, DeFi platforms are still in their early stages of development and are not yet able to offer the same level of stability and security as traditional banking services. Furthermore, they are currently facing significant regulatory challenges, particularly in the United States, where regulatory authorities are grappling with how to regulate DeFi platforms.

Despite these challenges, the growth of the cryptocurrency industry shows no signs of slowing down. In fact, many experts predict that cryptocurrencies and stablecoins will become increasingly important in the global financial system in the years to come. As a result, it is becoming increasingly important for the cryptocurrency industry to develop a stable and secure financial ecosystem that can support the growing demand for these new financial instruments.

Advertisement

In conclusion, the closure of three major American banks that serve cryptocurrency firms has sparked a debate within the cryptocurrency community about the risks of traditional finance institutions. As a result, the industry is now exploring new ways to create a more stable and secure financial ecosystem that can support the growing demand for cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. Whether through the creation of new neobank services, partnerships with existing institutions, or the development of DeFi platforms, the cryptocurrency industry is working to build a financial ecosystem that can weather the challenges of the traditional financial sector.



Source link

Advertisement

Crypto

Scammers adapt to survive during crypto winter

Published

on

By

4FA3AB74A25DACE54CAB4D8B6A58297E26C9B65C75CE046528BBFFE2CA2D4356.jpg


Advertisement
In a recent crypto crime webinar, Eric Jardine from Chainalysis revealed how scammers adapt their strategies to changes in market situations. While overall crypto scam revenue dropped in 2022, Jardine noted that not all scams behaved similarly. By sub-classing scams into types, he found that scammers were adapting to market conditions and turning to other strategies, such as giveaway and romantic scams, to prey on people’s emotions.

Jardine’s data revealed that as investment scams become less effective, romance and giveaway scams become more prevalent, indicating that scammers are not simply using the same script over and over again. They can adapt and change depending on market conditions. Additionally, Jardine highlighted that a multilevel marketing scam called hyperverse took a massive chunk out of the $5.9 billion lost to scams in 2022, racking up around $1.3 billion, which accounts for roughly 22% of scam revenue in that year.

Advertisement

The rise of romance and giveaway scams during the crypto winter is not surprising as scammers often prey on people’s emotions during difficult times. These scams are designed to target people who are feeling vulnerable and in need of support. Giveaway scams often promise free tokens or coins in exchange for personal information, while romance scams involve scammers posing as potential partners to gain access to victims’ personal information or money.

It’s important to note that these scams are not exclusive to the crypto world and have been used by scammers for years. However, the crypto world provides scammers with a new platform to reach a wider audience and target people who are investing in digital currencies. As the market conditions change, scammers will continue to adapt and find new ways to deceive people.

Advertisement

Investors and consumers must remain vigilant and educate themselves on the latest scams and tactics used by scammers. Platforms and exchanges can also play a significant role in detecting and preventing scams by implementing robust security measures and educating their users. By working together, we can help to mitigate the risks posed by scammers and protect the integrity of the crypto industry.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Independent Reserve Considers Expansion to Hong Kong

Published

on

By

3B1708A6C10FA78CA4B7ABCA5B441A70BBD200C715777A3B27E143509B4D67E6.jpg


Advertisement
Australia’s Independent Reserve Eyes Expansion to Hong Kong Amidst Proposed Licensing Regime for Crypto Exchanges

Independent Reserve, a cryptocurrency exchange based in Australia, is looking into expanding its business in Hong Kong following the city’s recent proposal of a licensing regime for crypto exchanges. The move is in line with Hong Kong’s ambitions to become Asia’s next cryptocurrency hub.

Advertisement

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) announced on February 20, 2023, that it will release a proposed licensing regime for cryptocurrency exchanges set to take effect in June of the same year. Under the new regime, Hong Kong-based crypto companies must comply with various measures relating to the safe custody of assets, such as Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Know Your Customer (KYC), counter-financing of terrorism (CFT) countermeasures, and conflict of interest disclosures and audits.

Adrian Przelozny, CEO of Independent Reserve, expressed his interest in expanding the company’s business in Hong Kong, saying that “right now, it is looking very interesting” and that “the recent announcement by the regulators in Hong Kong does make Hong Kong look like a friendly jurisdiction.” He added that his team will visit Hong Kong next week to meet with banks, regulators, lawyers, and compliance experts to determine if the location suits the company.

Advertisement

If Independent Reserve decides to expand to Hong Kong, it will join other cryptocurrency exchanges such as Huobi and OKX. Hong Kong’s proximity to mainland China, where cryptocurrency is heavily regulated, may make it an attractive destination for crypto exchanges looking to tap into the Chinese market.

Przelozny also commented on the region’s political relationship with China, stating that he believes China is testing how a more relaxed cryptocurrency regime looks in Hong Kong. Despite concerns over the potential impact of China’s regulations on Hong Kong’s cryptocurrency industry, the city’s government has remained committed to developing the industry and positioning itself as a hub for digital assets.

Advertisement

Independent Reserve’s potential expansion to Hong Kong is a significant move for the company and a promising sign for Hong Kong’s burgeoning cryptocurrency industry. As the city continues to establish itself as a hub for digital assets, more and more companies are likely to follow suit.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Coinbase CEO Compares SEC to Soccer Refs in Criticism of Lack of Clarity Around Crypto Regulation

Published

on

By

64D7ADADF11E1C4A16CD7AF859B3EDF8CA8305366CE370666F2EBF6B33BAB40E.jpg


Advertisement
In a recent development, Coinbase, the popular cryptocurrency exchange, has been issued a Wells notice by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which typically precedes an enforcement action. The news prompted Coinbase CEO, Brian Armstrong, to criticize the SEC for its lack of clarity around crypto regulation. In a series of tweets, Armstrong compared the SEC to “soccer refs” in a game of pickleball, arguing that they could not agree on the rules of the “new game” of crypto regulation.

Armstrong’s criticism comes as the crypto industry faces ongoing debates around who should be the primary body regulating crypto, with the SEC being just one of many potential regulators. There has been concern among crypto companies that regulators lack a clear understanding of the industry and that their regulatory efforts may stifle innovation and drive activity offshore.

Advertisement

The reference to a “call they made back in April 2021” refers to the SEC’s approval of Coinbase’s application to go public. Armstrong argued that the company’s filings “clearly explained” its asset listing process and “included 57 references to staking.” However, the recent Wells notice suggests that the SEC has reversed its earlier position and is now seeking to take enforcement action against Coinbase.

Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, also criticized the SEC’s lack of clarity around crypto regulation, claiming that the agency had provided “no clear rule book” and that “efforts to engage with the SEC are met with silence or enforcement actions.” Both Armstrong and Grewal appear to welcome the chance to use the “legal process” to provide the crypto industry with regulatory clarity and to defend Coinbase against the SEC’s enforcement action.

Advertisement

The news of the Wells notice has been widely condemned by the crypto community, with many agreeing that the SEC has reversed its earlier position regarding Coinbase. The community also seems to be throwing their support behind Coinbase, believing that the company will be fighting on behalf of the entire U.S. crypto industry as an unclear regulatory environment drives activity offshore.

In conclusion, the recent Wells notice issued to Coinbase by the SEC has sparked a debate around the lack of clarity and understanding among regulators when it comes to crypto regulation. Coinbase’s CEO and chief legal officer have criticized the SEC’s lack of clarity and seem to be welcoming the chance to use the legal process to provide the industry with regulatory clarity. The crypto community has widely condemned the notice, with many agreeing that the SEC has reversed its earlier position regarding Coinbase.



Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending