Connect with us

Crypto

CEO Sues Board Members for Seizing Control of Crypto Miner

Published

on

EDA19E0082C3A8BF921125B385EFADC6D6AF14C005E0DF9467B27A6F9479B96C.jpg


Advertisement
The Chief Executive Officer of the cryptocurrency miner Layer1 Technologies has filed a lawsuit against the other two board members of the business, one of whom being Jakov Dolic, the co-founder of the company. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated several policies and procedures of the company. This allegation is reinforced by the plaintiff’s charges, which state that the defendants improperly appropriated Layer1’s activities for their own benefit. The plaintiff is the one who brought this lawsuit.

The action against Dolic and fellow board member Tobias Ebel was filed with the Delaware Chancery Court on February 2, by John Harney, the Chief Executive Officer of Layer1, and DGF Investments Inc., an investment corporation having its home in the British Virgin Islands. Dolic and Ebel were named as the targets of the lawsuit. When the complaint was first filed against Dolic and Ebel, it was Harney and DGF Investments Inc. who were the ones to commence the legal proceedings by doing so.

Advertisement

The complaint alleges that both Dolic and Ebel took advantage of a lack of leadership at Layer1’s equity parent Enigma in order to gain control of the Bitcoin mining firm and manage it as their “own personal fiefdom.” The complaint also alleges that they did this in order to enrich themselves financially. This is what the claims that are included in the complaint allege to be the case. It is speculated that this took place at Enigma, the equity parent company of Layer1, and that a power vacuum was used in order to accomplish the task.

Harney and DGF Investments Inc., which owns a majority stake in Enigma, claim that the defendants have “usurped the authority” of Layer1’s CEO and prevented Harney from “responsibly operating Layer1.” They say this happened because the defendants “obstructed” Harney’s ability to “responsibly operate Layer1.” They claim that this occurrence had place as a result of the defendants’ “obstruction” of Harney’s capacity to “responsibly run Layer1.” They claim that this happens because of the interference that the defendants provide, which precludes Harney from “responsibly running Layer1.” Both of these accusations are being brought up as potential claims in the legal action that has been taken against the defendants.



Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement

Crypto

Australian Banks Ordered to Report Crypto Transactions

Published

on

By

1BCCB11316A48FC6A206B4A78488B98AE7AC98FE5B5DA31D0253C8CAE4A4DEE5.jpg


Advertisement
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has reportedly ordered local banks to report on their exposure to cryptocurrency transactions in the wake of recent banking collapses, including the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Silvergate failures. The regulator is seeking to obtain more information and insight into banking exposures to crypto assets and associated risks.

According to the Australian Financial Review, the APRA has instructed banks to improve their reporting on crypto assets and provide daily updates to the regulator. The agency has started requesting banks to declare their exposures to startups and crypto-related companies, citing three people familiar with the matter. The new measures are reportedly part of the APRA’s increased supervision of the banking sector, aimed at mitigating the risk of similar collapses occurring in Australia’s banking system.

Advertisement

The move comes in the aftermath of the collapse of global banks, including Credit Suisse and SVB, which have raised concerns over the stability of the financial system. On March 19, UBS Group agreed to buy Credit Suisse for $3.2 billion after the latter collapsed over the weekend. The banking sector has been facing pressure from investors and regulators to improve risk management and transparency.

Barrenjoey analyst Jonathan Mott reportedly warned that while the situation “remains stable” for Australian banks, confidence could be quickly disrupted, putting pressure on bank margins. The APRA’s increased scrutiny of cryptocurrency transactions is aimed at mitigating this risk, as the regulator seeks to gain a deeper understanding of the potential impact of crypto assets on the stability of the banking system.

Advertisement

The Australian government has been taking a cautious approach to regulating the cryptocurrency industry, with the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) recently stating that it has no plans to issue a digital version of the Australian dollar. However, the APRA’s move to increase reporting requirements on crypto assets suggests that regulators are taking a more active role in monitoring the sector.

In conclusion, the APRA’s decision to order local banks to report on cryptocurrency transactions reflects the growing concern over the potential risks posed by crypto assets to the stability of the banking system. While the situation in Australia remains stable, the recent collapses of global banks have highlighted the need for improved risk management and transparency in the financial sector. The APRA’s increased scrutiny of the crypto industry is a step towards achieving this goal, as regulators seek to gain a deeper understanding of the potential impact of crypto assets on the stability of the financial system.



Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Bitcoin Hodlers Experience Profits on Majority of Trading Days

Published

on

By

4FCED7C746E93FAB7681326C70AD46B5161FE524F0735411C51877A4B243B20E.jpg


Advertisement
Bitcoin has been a popular investment asset since its inception in 2009, and data shows that hodlers have experienced profits on the majority of trading days. According to Blockchain.com, Bitcoin hodlers enjoyed profitable days on 88.50% of the 4,593 days the cryptocurrency has been tradable. This challenges the historical narrative that crypto has depreciating volatility, proving that holding Bitcoin is provably profitable in the long run.

The profitability of Bitcoin can be attributed to its hard limit on total supply and seamless global usability. These factors have contributed to its status as a store of value, and the historical price performance of Bitcoin confirms its potential as a profitable investment. However, investors must understand Bitcoin’s market cycles to maximize their profits and avoid buying at the top and selling at the dip.

Advertisement

Out of the 4,593 trading days, only 531 or 11.56% were unprofitable for long-term hodlers. These unprofitable days occurred between December 28, 2022, and June 12, 2022, during which Bitcoin was priced above the range of $26,246.58 and $28,344.5. This emphasizes the importance of understanding market cycles, and investors should exercise caution to avoid significant losses.

While some investors prefer to hold Bitcoin long-term, others make daily trades on crypto exchanges for consistent profits. Regardless of the investment strategy, understanding the market cycles and trends is crucial for maximizing profits.

Advertisement

However, investing in Bitcoin is not without its risks, as demonstrated by the recent security vulnerability discovered by General Bytes. The manufacturer of Bitcoin ATMs had to shut down its cloud services after discovering a vulnerability that allowed attackers to access users’ hot wallets and gain sensitive information. Karel Kyovsky, the founder of General Bytes, stated that multiple security audits since 2021 did not identify the vulnerability.

In conclusion, Bitcoin’s profitability challenges the historical narrative of depreciating volatility in the crypto market. Hodlers have experienced profits on the majority of trading days, making Bitcoin a potentially lucrative investment asset. However, understanding market cycles and trends is essential for investors to maximize their profits and avoid significant losses. Additionally, investors should be aware of the potential risks associated with investing in Bitcoin, such as security vulnerabilities.



Source link

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

MetaMask Enables Direct Bank Transfers for Crypto Purchases in Nigeria

Published

on

By

33941773EAEF2969F57E22DE2E0D66A411573B8B93E6EB867FA4F43EF098F4E6.jpg


Advertisement
In a move that aims to make self-custody cryptocurrency purchases more accessible in Nigeria, MetaMask has partnered with MoonPay to expand direct on-ramps with local banks. ConsenSys, the parent firm of MetaMask, announced the integration on March 21, allowing users in Nigeria to purchase crypto via instant bank transfers. This new feature is available within the MetaMask mobile and Portfolio DApp, significantly simplifying the process of buying crypto without using credit or debit cards in Nigeria.

Previously, MoonPay had a card integration feature, but about 90% of attempts to buy crypto with a credit or debit card were declined, according to Santos, a MetaMask spokesperson. With the new integration supporting local bank transfers, crypto purchases on MetaMask are now faster and cheaper, allowing users to access crypto without sending assets from a centralized exchange.

Advertisement

Despite the current issues with crypto on-ramps in Nigeria, the country has emerged as a major market for MetaMask, ranking third in mobile monthly active users. It is also among the top ten countries in terms of visitors to metamask.io over the last month, Santos added. Nigeria is one of the world’s top 20 ranked countries in cryptocurrency adoption, according to the Chainalysis 2022 Global Crypto Adoption Index. Some reports suggest that 35% of the Nigerian population aged 18 to 60 owned or traded cryptocurrencies in 2022.

This high level of adoption is despite the Central Bank of Nigeria banning banks from servicing crypto exchanges in February 2021. However, in December 2022, local media reported that the Nigerian government was preparing to pass a law recognizing the usage of Bitcoin (BTC) and other cryptocurrencies to keep up to date with “global practices.” This move, coupled with the new integration between MetaMask and MoonPay, may signal a growing acceptance of cryptocurrencies in Nigeria.

Advertisement

It is important to note that Nigeria’s cryptocurrency market faces challenges such as a lack of regulatory clarity and security concerns. However, the partnership between MetaMask and MoonPay provides a viable solution for those seeking to invest in crypto without the use of credit or debit cards. As the adoption of cryptocurrencies continues to grow in Nigeria and other countries around the world, we may see further innovations aimed at increasing accessibility and usability.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending